Many individuals might think that using a blockchain technology doesn’t support mathematical computations and other logical reasoning guidelines associated with them.
But there is nothing that there are no computational logics involved. Instead, the technology is solely capable of introspecting every node and the information it contains.
However, the logic and the associated protocols tend to vary if in case the complexity and the related scalability increases abruptly. Either the miners or the developers working onto the network make the manual modifications regarding the same or they may use the automated ways of acquiring them.
All this is because there are expectations associated. Users – like CPAs, developers, higher authorities (CFO, CTO, etc) – know if the data is kept on the nodes – the operations will be implemented securely.
Even many times they might get astonished to fall into the traps of the misconceptions that may occur when terminologies of big data or the relatable analytics interchange with each other.
Therefore, it is necessary to clarify the POW concept – Proof-Of-Work – playing a vital role in along-with maintaining the difficulties emerging in the path of the blockchain network and proposing solutions at peculiar instances.
A tour onto the POW paradigm for better understanding
In the Proof-Of-Work problem and the associated solutions, nodes are participating in the existing blockchain network. All of them can be entitled as blocks – being a part of the blockchain technology.
Now the interesting fact is that miners can either remove the block or add one – depending on the existing business requirements and the demands proposed by the markets. Moreover, miners tend to process the transactions and propose the necessary upgrades with the sole idea that rewards could either be taken or distributed to the others participating.
But the fact remains untold that the mathematical puzzle involved during the transactions can be solved or solve the computational problems with some hash values mapped with dynamic addresses.
1. Factorizing the susceptible calculations
Most often, the difficulties grow when the population of miners increases in an expected or unexpected manner. This sudden change results in the denial of taking services from the existing miners because every miner will now start making modifications as per their vision.
Here, accuracy and speed won’t work because each miner will compete and not praise the changes or the solutions offered by others. Thus, the issue must be encountered with utmost sensitivity – rather than estimating the barriers miners may create in the existing network.
One must take a step ahead to factorize the existing problems. This can either be done by deciding for breaking the existing chain supporting blockchain technology or creating a whole new one by replicating the hash values of the existing blocks to the new ones.
It will – not only prohibit the vulnerable attacks from the existing miners or the outside assaulters because of the denial of offering the solutions for the current issue – but also add a token of significance. Due to this, all the miners having high stakes for solving the complex calculations can now be not thinking about the useless idea or the strategy that may destroy the existing network.
Notwithstanding, the existing systems accessing indirectly the informative and scalable mining pools can reverse the transactions – if demanded. The purpose to do the same is that the outflow of the miners participating in the network has resulted in losses.
With such a reversal prodigy, controlling the losses – by assigning the collected rewards from the miners (destroyed) to those who wish to join the network – has now been achieved.
Besides, the huge amounts of money spent by the miners for removing the flaws that may arise unexpectedly in the POW process won’t go in vain. This is because such costs involved for strengthening the pillars of the blockchain technology can’t only be optimized but also be used to making the encryption protocols more advance and convenient-to-use at difficult times.
2. Investigating the block validity in a non-time-consuming manner
In some of the instances, it becomes mandatory to validate the block used by the miners somehow estimating the significance of blockchain technology.
The reason that supports the fact is that such a validation acquires some probability that can be a decisive factor for the success of the blockchain project – onto which the miners are working.
Furthermore, the spams associated with such validations or arise amidst the validation process can be marked and then, removed. If such an action is not taken promptly, it may decelerate the whole process of the POW participants.
Besides, legitimate tokens can also be adjusted so that tampering can be avoided. If one talks about tampering, it is such a powerful activity that can deteriorate the regeneration of the new blocks (like successors) that are necessarily accessing the hash values of their predecessors (the previous miners who have participated or are forced to get destroyed in the existing process).
In this manner, the validations can’t only accelerate the process of POW algorithms but also prohibits the wastage of time as the new blocks are generated after few minutes and the new ones have all the rewards that can derive profit-oriented results on a timely basis and trustworthy manner.
3. Reusing the existing nodes that fail to join other chains
Many times it happens that some of the older blocks acquiring exclusive data-sets aren’t passed onto the other blockchains. The reason for the same is that the present blockchain technology and the associated principles applied by the miners think they won’t be able to compete well with the complex structures involved in the projects.
Thus, to re-use them, the hash rate is set lower than the percentage of the number of nodes that may be generated for further processing. Though the security will be low in this case, yet it will be easier for a certain time to re-use the remaining older nodes so that they may pass onto the other chains for performing necessary computations.
Even if they fail to join the other chains residing within the network, the miners may increase the hash rate so that the attack that may occur due to a sudden increase in the population of the nodes can’t only be encountered well, but also be prohibited as per the demands from the client’s or the management end.
Is Proof-Of-Work worth to implement?
There are many algorithms on which blockchain network work to derive the solutions that may solve real-time complexities. From those, POW or Proof-of-Work is the one that caters to all the miners and the information stored by them onto the blocks (or the nodes participating in the network).
Even the POW significance discussed above can minimize the risk associated with the hash values which – when stolen – may invite losses in the future. This is the reason many minors prefer not to get entangled with the risks associated.
Additionally, tampering with the existing blocks needs to be prohibited. This is so as it won’t allow the successors to regenerate if in case the preceding blocks comprising of a set of rewards and hash values are forced to destroy.
The reason that it is done is that the long strings encompassed into the hash codes may turn the table anytime and increase the complexity of achieving the necessary solutions.
Instead, they use its powers and prefer to apply the combinations through which it becomes easier to use the existing blockchain network for solving computational problems with much of speediness and time-oriented manner.